Second Plant
Lab: Angiosperms, Vascular Architecture, Secondary Growth, and
Review
MiraCosta College
Biology 202
This is the second
two lab activities dedicated to plant biology.
Today's
activities: I found a
couple more of those goofy PowerPoint slide shows that pertain to last
week's lab. The pictures are a little different and there are no
"prompts," so it would be a good review, while it throws in a few more
things that we didn't get to talk about last week.
The main objective
for today is to survey some of the anatomical and physiological aspects
of plant vasculature--a lot of xylem and phloem talk. We'll
survey the angiosperms first, then look at the roots, stems and leaves
of monocots and dicots, paying attention to the location and layout of
the various vascular elements. The last issue--kind of a fun one
for me--is the structure of wood, which is the product of plant
secondary growth, i.e., in girth as a tree grows thicker.
Slideshow A.
Click HERE.
[This shows some
photosynthetic eukaryotes that we didn't get to see last time, and it
shows three levels of multicellularity in green algae.]
Slideshow B.
Click HERE.
[This is another
slide show with mosses, liverworts, ferns and horsetails. Use
this to test yourself at identifying these basal plants.]
Slideshow C.
Click HERE.
[This is another
show with gymnosperms. Another opportunity for self-test on last
week's content.]
Slideshow D.
Click HERE.
[This is a show
surveying the different groups of flowering plants.]
Slideshow E.
Click HERE.
[This show
overviews the general vascular architecture of dicot and monocot (and
to a certain extent gymnosperm) stems, roots and leaves.]
Slideshow F.
Click HERE.
[This short show
covers the issues of plant secondary growth and the structure of wood.]
<>
Lab Objective
questions:
1) Why is the Gymnospermae a paraphyletic taxon? What group of
gymnosperms is most closely aligned with flowering plants? Which
group might be second closest, and what non-molecular character states
can we use to unite these groupings?
2) Which types of flowering plants are "basal" to the angiosperm
portion of the tree of life? Why is inappropriate to identify
these plants as "dicots"?
3) What are the main characteristics that distinguish monocots
from dicots?
4) What are some examples of representative monocots?
5) What is the difference between tracheids and vessel
elements? What kind of plants have vessel elements?
6) In tissues where xylem is composed only of tracheids, how do
individual tracheids "communicate," i.e., pass xylem sap from one to
another?
6) Why are mature xylem vessels A) nonliving and B) heavily
reinforced?
7) In what sense are phloem vessel elements A) living cells (in
contrast to xylem vessel elements) and B) necessarily continuous with
each other via the pores in the sieve plates?
8) In the vascular bundles of stems, how do monocots and dicots
differ in the "layout" of xylem and phloem?
9) In the vascular core or stele of the root of a dicot, how does
water pass from the soil into the xylem?
10) Where is the endodermis in the root of a dicot, and what doe
it "do"?
11) In the layout of a typical dicot leaf, what are the two
"layers" of mesophyll cells, and how are they different in appearance
and function?
12) What is the vascular cambium, and where does it occur in the
vascular bundles of a dicot?
13) How does the "vascular bundle" layout of a dicot stem meld
into the "vascular ring" layout as the plant matures into one having
woody stems?
14) How does continual production of xylem and phloem from the
vascular cambium result in secondary growth in the case of a dicot
plant?
15) In woody plants growing in seasonal climates, what do the
growth rings represent?
16) Axillary rays are what you see running perpendicular with the
growth rings in the wood on the back of a violin (this is the
"fiddleback figure"). How must the maple trunk be cut in order to
produce a board that can be used to make the violin back?
17) What is the difference between "hardwood" and "softwood" (and
it has nothing to do with the hardness/softness!)?
18) Genetically engineered Douglas fir will grow to harvestable
size in half the time relative to natural stands of Douglas fir.
Boards (e.g., two-by-fours) cut from such wood is substantially weaker
than boards of the same dimensions cut from natural trees. Why?
>